Edmund Burke wrote:
Would it be possible to ban "truthers" so a real discussion can take place.
Why ban a persons comment or opinion? What else is to be banned?
I second that Derek, if Dr North, was the banning type he'd have slung me off ages ago for my repeated posts about smoking which many probably get fed up with.
Who's to say if 'truthers' truth is any less credible than anyone else's truth.
It really pisses me off that because someone doesn't like certain things they believe they have to be banned. Let's just ban life and be done with it.
As it happens I tend to agree with Tap, not on everything, think Cameron, though I believe he's seen sense on this, but on some of the things he say's about the USA. It can't be denied that the CIA funded the EU, or is that seen as a conspiracy theorists delusion. Admitted Tap, does dramatic, and very well I might add, but that doesn't mean he's wrong.
I've always been a supporter of America, but I'm coming to distrust them a lot, not ordinary people of course, and nothing to do with the conflicts in Iraq & Afghanistan. I'm so sick of all their lunacies being adopted over here. Their latest lunacy being the naked scanners & full body, hands down the trousers groping about & pulling open blouses, pat downs which to my mind amounts to legalised sexual assault, and the best thing about it Neapalitano, or whatever her name is, is going to exempt those in burkas from being sexually molested. It won't be long before they implement a sexual assault policy here. Sexual deviants/predators & nonces will be lining up to apply for a position as airport security officers, men & women.