Bagua wrote:
Shub Niggurath wrote:
Why drag the Indian flag into this? Come on....
Well said.
The idea that the one Indian reprobate Pachauri reflects poorly on the entire people of India is both risible and disgusting. Most of the most ardent and vile warmists are westerners. Professor Phil Jones come to mind, is he a "wog"?
The people of India are suffering the most from Pachauri's delusions and deceptions. The penalty for us is a cut in an already high standard of living, unacceptable, but not devastating; for those in the third world, it means never joining the modern world.
Beyond that, we have a major own goal here by reducing the legitimate and sound criticism of Pachauri to the level of easily dismissed racial hatred. Ending the Climate Delusion would have the opposite effect to damaging the third world, it would help them develop. This hostility is needless, self-defeating and damaging to this blog and forum.
Hnnnn.
I'd half agree with that, in that I'm not so sure it was that well said. There are bits missing.
Bagua wrote:
Professor Phil Jones come to mind, is he a "wog"?
Not strictly, but might as well be. He's thoroughly alien.
Bagua wrote:
The people of India are suffering the most from Pachauri's delusions and deceptions.
Come on now, Bagua, they're always suffering from one sort of corruption or another. I think it might be genetic. And "the most"? No trickle down to phucked-rigid British OAP
contributors?
Bagua wrote:
Beyond that, we have a major own goal here by reducing the legitimate and sound criticism of Pachauri to the level of easily dismissed racial hatred.
I hate (AKA, in practice,
racially™ hate) having uninvited wogs or any other kind of unwanted alienoidards in my country . Show me how to 'dismiss' that easily.
Bagua wrote:
This hostility is needless, self-defeating and damaging to this blog and forum.
You say.
Are you happy to have wogs moving into your street/road/lane without you having any say in it? Let's say you are. Are you then prescribing the same for the rest of us? Well, for me anyway — I speak for no one else?
This whole business is highly interconnected, Bagua. So let's not pretend we can discuss these things one at a time in some kind of simplistic isolation.
What we need here is a decent framework. My preference right now though is for a
Weltanschauung.
And I reckon I have one.
Good moderating, like good policing, is about not being required.
To our international visitors: If you feel this commenter ever goes too far, the moderators will be happy to remove this twaddle on request. However we do wish to try and maintain our record of non-censorship