Charlie wrote:
If the Bilderbergers are talking Global Cooling, then that's the battle against the Warmists well and truly won, isn't it?
It should be shouted from every rooftop!
You are defining the target too narrowly. The target is attempting to become more diffuse by talking about Climate Change rather than Global Warming, and now Climate Disruption. A mistake was made in talking about Global Warming, which was an easy sell at the time, but lead to problems later on. Climate Change would have been harder to sell but easier to defend. Climate Disruption? Well, any unusual weather event is Climate Disruption, hot, cold, or staying the same too long. It's a desperate attempt to keep the scam going.
The target is people who for divers reasons, are attempting to push unaccountable trans-national government on the back of a terrible threat we are all contributing to by just going about our lives - that is, manipulate us by manufactured guilt, and manipulate us into something we wouldn't possibly stand for if it wasn't sailing under a false flag. "Warmists" only partly describes them and the motives of the "Warmists" are not all the same.
I really don't see the Bilderbergers as a central planning point, they don't have the time and I can't see they have the cohesion to carry out a plot. If they are talking about Global Cooling, see it as more of a commentary on where the great and the good really see things. Climate Disruption still covers it.
Energy Security is a tad nationalistic. It could lead to unfortunate themes being developed. "Coping with Climate Change" is the sort of balancing act the Tories excel at. You might think it's about the UK coping with Climate Change, but the intention is that the scams can continue under a different name.