gareth wrote:
You'd think animal welfare charities and vegetarian campaigners would be far more vocal about this. Perhaps like some feminist groups they have a bit of a blind spot for Islam.
In the late 20th century women formed the core support base for animal welfare and vegetarianism. These campaigns and charities were vehicles to give women a voice and employ women so they could have financial independence and 'live it up'. Today they are not needed.
Why? We have quotas and targets for female employment. Also, the modern economy has more jobs for women than it did 30 years ago since it is female service-orientated, while male-orientated manufacturing jobs have been exported or made redundant by technology.
So it's not the feminists, its middle class women in general who give Muslims a free pass. They never really cared about the "causes" or ideology we associate them with, they were vehicles to get them independence from men so they could mess around and not have to worry about having kids.
jamesd wrote:
Does this mean that the person doing the killing in an abattoir has to be a Muslim and is this not in contravention of employment law?
Good question.
Quote:
once again vociferous (and in this case aggreesive) minorities seek to change how we tink and act and challenge our beliefs and values.
Don't underestimate the extent of voluntary conformism motivated by the desire of an individual to get into a position in society where he or she can call anyone he wants a hater and wreck their career.