by Budgie » Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:11 pm
If Cameron is not in power inevitably he could not halt Lisbon, or even have a referendum. As Lisbon goes through it will change the EU's constitution, embedding itself in the two re-vamped foundation treaties. So after the implementation of Lisbon, a referendum on Lisbon is, for all practical purposes, pointless. If Cameron had repeatedly made that clear he would not have found himself considered as fraudulent as Brown.
So the battle over Lisbon is lost, but that does not mean the war has to be lost. If Cameron gains power, he claims he will be able to negotiate a change in our membership terms. He is not saying how he will manage make the other 26 nations agree to do this. So he is making the same idiotic presentational mistake as he did over his claims to hold a Lisbon referendum.
Any real negotiation with the EU must conform to the fundamental of all negotiations - the UK must either give the EU something or take something away from the EU. We cannot give the EU anything it wants, by definition. Thus the only credible threat Cameron can make is to leave the EU unless he gets his way. He refuses to do this. Therefore his re-negotiation will fail. Do we really have to cycle through all this yet again? Is he thick, or is he a fraud?